TRANSFER PRICING

When Value Moves Across Borders, Transfer Pricing Matters.

For multinational businesses, transactions between related entities are part of everyday operations. Goods are supplied. Services are provided. Intellectual property is used. Financing moves between companies. Functions, assets and risks are distributed across jurisdictions.

Professionals reviewing transfer pricing analysis

Parker Russell member firms provide transfer pricing expertise to international businesses seeking to understand, structure, document and defend their intercompany arrangements across multiple jurisdictions.

Our approach considers not only the numbers attached to a transaction, but the business activity behind them — how value is created, which entities perform the relevant functions, where assets are used, how risks are managed and whether the resulting transfer pricing position can withstand scrutiny.

Transfer pricing should reflect how the business actually operates.

01 — WHY TRANSFER PRICING MATTERS

An Internal Transaction Can Create an External Tax Risk.

Transactions within a group may happen between related companies, but their tax consequences are very real.

As businesses expand internationally, tax authorities increasingly need to understand how profits are allocated between jurisdictions and whether related-party transactions reflect the economic activity taking place.

A transfer pricing position that is not properly designed or documented can create uncertainty, adjustments and disputes — particularly when different tax authorities examine different parts of the same international structure.

That makes transfer pricing more than a documentation exercise.

It requires businesses to understand the relationship between:

  1. how the group operates;

  2. where value is created;

  3. how related entities transact;

  4. how profits are allocated;

  5. and how that position can be supported.

The stronger the connection between commercial reality and transfer pricing, the stronger the position behind it.

02 — WHEN TRANSFER PRICING BECOMES CRITICAL

International Growth Changes the Transfer Pricing Picture.

Transfer pricing becomes increasingly important as the number, scale and complexity of transactions within an international group grow.

Entering New Markets

Establishing entities or operations in another jurisdiction can introduce new intercompany relationships and transfer pricing requirements.

Changing the Group Structure

Acquisitions, reorganisations and changes in operating models can alter where functions are performed, assets are used and risks are managed.

Increasing Intercompany Transactions

Growing volumes of goods, services, financing, intellectual property or other related-party transactions can increase both complexity and exposure.

Developing Intellectual Property

Where intellectual property is developed, owned or used across jurisdictions, understanding the underlying functions and economic relationships becomes particularly important.

Financing Across the Group

Intercompany loans and other financial arrangements can create transfer pricing considerations around pricing, terms and the commercial basis of the arrangement.

Facing Greater Tax Scrutiny

When tax authorities examine related-party transactions, businesses need a position that is supported by appropriate analysis and documentation.

03 — DESIGN. DOCUMENT. DEFEND.

A Strong Transfer Pricing Position Has to Work at Every Stage.

01 — DESIGN

Build the Position Around the Business.

Transfer pricing begins with understanding how the group actually operates.

  • Which entities perform the important functions?
  • Where are key decisions made?
  • Which assets are used?
  • Where are risks assumed and managed?
  • How do entities contribute to the creation of value?

The answers provide the economic foundation for considering how related-party transactions should be structured and priced.

A transfer pricing policy that does not reflect commercial reality may become difficult to support regardless of how extensive the documentation is.

02 — DOCUMENT

Make the Rationale Clear and Supportable.

Documentation should explain more than the result.

It should provide a coherent basis for understanding the relevant transactions, entities, functions, economic circumstances and transfer pricing approach.

Parker Russell member firms can bring relevant local expertise to documentation requirements within their jurisdictions while considering the wider international structure of the group.

The objective is a transfer pricing position that can be understood, evidenced and consistently applied.

03 — DEFEND

Be Ready to Explain the Position Under Scrutiny.

Transfer pricing positions may be examined by tax authorities long after the underlying transactions have taken place.

A defensible position therefore requires more than documentation prepared simply to satisfy a filing requirement.

The commercial rationale, economic analysis and supporting evidence need to tell a consistent story.

01

Design the position correctly.

02

Document the reasoning clearly.

03

Be prepared to defend the result.

05 — FOLLOW THE VALUE

Transfer Pricing Starts With Understanding Where Value Is Created.

A legal structure shows where companies are incorporated.

It does not necessarily explain where economic activity takes place.

To understand an international group's transfer pricing position, it is necessary to look beneath the organisational chart.

The structure tells you where the entities are.

The analysis explains what they actually do.

FUNCTIONS

What activities does each entity actually perform?

ASSETS

Which tangible and intangible assets are used to create value?

RISKS

Which entities assume and manage economically significant risks?

PEOPLE

Where are important activities and decisions actually carried out?

TRANSACTIONS

What is being transferred between related entities — and why?

VALUE

How do those contributions connect to the economic outcome?

06 — THE INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGE

One Group. Multiple Tax Authorities.

Transfer pricing is inherently international.

  • A transaction between two related companies connects at least two entities — and potentially two different tax systems with different documentation requirements, administrative practices and areas of scrutiny.

    For larger international structures, the number of interconnected relationships can grow quickly.

  • The challenge is therefore not simply to establish an appropriate position within one jurisdiction.

    It is to understand how that position fits within the group as a whole.

Through Parker Russell International, independent member firms can collaborate where transfer pricing matters extend across jurisdictions, combining relevant local knowledge with a wider view of the international structure.

Explore Our Global Network
International collaboration on transfer pricing

Local requirements. International consistency.

07 — WHEN THE BUSINESS CHANGES, TRANSFER PRICING MUST FOLLOW

Yesterday's Policy May Not Reflect Today's Business.

International businesses change continuously.

They acquire companies.

Enter new markets.

Move functions.

Develop intellectual property.

Change supply chains.

Centralise services.

Introduce new financing arrangements.

Restructure operations.

Each change can alter the economic relationships between group entities.

A transfer pricing framework therefore needs to remain aligned with how the organisation actually operates — not simply how it operated when the original documentation was prepared.

If the business changes, the transfer pricing analysis may need to change with it.

08 — FROM TRANSACTION TO TRANSFER PRICING POSITION

Understand the Transaction Before Pricing It.

01 — IDENTIFY

Which related-party transactions exist across the group?

02 — UNDERSTAND

What is the commercial purpose and economic substance of each arrangement?

03 — ANALYSE

Which functions are performed, assets used and risks assumed by the relevant entities?

04 — ASSESS

How should the transaction be considered from a transfer pricing perspective?

05 — DOCUMENT

What evidence and documentation are required to support the position?

06 — REVIEW

Does the approach remain appropriate as the business and regulatory environment evolve?

A defensible position begins with understanding the transaction itself.

09 — TRANSFER PRICING RISK

Risk Often Sits in the Gap Between Policy and Reality.

A group may have a transfer pricing policy on paper.

The more important question is whether actual business activity continues to reflect it.

Illustration of transfer pricing policy versus business reality

Risk can emerge when:

  1. intercompany arrangements evolve but documentation does not;

  2. the business enters new jurisdictions;

  3. functions or decision-making move between entities;

  4. new intellectual property is developed or used;

  5. group financing changes;

  6. actual conduct differs from documented arrangements;

  7. or different parts of the group apply the policy inconsistently.

10 — DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS. DIFFERENT RESPONSIBILITIES.

Transfer Pricing Extends Beyond the Tax Department.

For CFOs

How could transfer pricing affect the group's financial and tax position across jurisdictions?

For Tax Directors

Is the group's transfer pricing framework coherent, documented and aligned with its current operating model?

For Boards

Are significant international tax risks understood and appropriately governed?

For Finance Teams

Are intercompany arrangements being applied consistently and supported by appropriate information?

For International Groups

Can the transfer pricing position be understood consistently across the jurisdictions in which the organisation operates?

For Businesses Entering New Markets

How should new intercompany relationships be considered before operations begin to scale?

11 — WHAT A STRONG TRANSFER PRICING POSITION REQUIRES

Technical Analysis Is Only One Part of the Position.

  • Commercial Understanding

    Transfer pricing needs to reflect how the business actually creates value and operates.

  • Economic Analysis

    The financial and economic substance of related-party arrangements needs to support the approach taken.

  • Local Knowledge

    Requirements and areas of scrutiny can differ between jurisdictions.

  • International Perspective

    Individual transactions need to be understood within the wider structure of the multinational group.

  • Consistency

    Policy, documentation and actual business conduct should tell the same economic story.

  • Forward Thinking

    Changes in the business should be considered before they create inconsistencies in the transfer pricing position.

Build a Transfer Pricing Position That Can Stand Up to Scrutiny.

A strong transfer pricing framework should do more than satisfy a documentation requirement.

It should reflect how the business operates, provide a coherent basis for related-party transactions and remain supportable as the organisation grows and changes.

Parker Russell member firms combine local tax knowledge with international collaboration to help businesses understand and assess transfer pricing risk across the jurisdictions in which they operate.

Design it around the business.
Document it around the evidence.
Defend it with confidence.